Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	25	.480	2	1	3	0.20	12	.750	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.58
2	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	8	26	.192	12	4	2	1.00	22	.909	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.63
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.90
5	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.16
7	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	16	.375	8	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.47
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.56
11	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	0	11	.727	4	0	5	0.00	15	.667	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.72
13	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.87
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.12
22	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.64
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.56
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.58
26	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	9	3	1	1.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.49
29	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	13	.769	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.50
30	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	15	.133	3	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.67
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.61
39	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.37
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.06
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.51
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	14	.143	6	4	2	1.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.34
Total		71	133	1.87	38	227	.419	92	23	42	0.32	249	.831	.	.	.	.	177.0	5.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.58
2	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.63
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.90
5	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.16
7	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.47
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.14
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.56
11	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.72
13	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.87
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.12
22	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.64
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.56
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.58
26	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.49
29	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.50
30	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.67
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.61
39	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.37
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.06
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.51
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.34
Total		71	1	40	41	5	0.58	77	1.08	.	.	.	.	.	177.0	5.88