Players

Daniel Richter 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	15	15	15	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	24	.125	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.32
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	4	31	.452	6	1	1	0.20	19	.947	1	0.20	1	1.000	19.0	5.96
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	32	.094	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	4.93
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	42	.429	5	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.23
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	14	.500	14	3	1	1.00	20	.950	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.28
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	19	.368	6	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.26
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	10	27	.037	6	2	5	0.50	16	.688	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	5.77
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	26	.346	5	2	3	0.40	18	.833	1	0.20	2	.500	16.0	5.63
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	17	.294	8	3	2	0.75	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	4.59
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	2	28	.679	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.59
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.25
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	21	.381	13	1	4	0.25	24	.833	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.61
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	38	.421	9	1	2	0.20	22	.909	1	0.20	2	.500	24.0	7.97
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	24	.542	1	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.63
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	18	.611	7	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.21
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	9	31	.258	9	0	0	0.00	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.01
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	12	.917	5	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	8.29
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	10	3	3	1.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.80
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	5	25	.440	9	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.91
Total		72	249	3.46	72	450	.393	127	20	31	0.28	308	.899	5	0.07	9	.556	285.0	6.54

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.00	15	0	1.000	10.0	5.32
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	16	1.82	38	7	.816	19.0	5.96
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	1.74	27	3	.889	10.5	4.93
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	7	1.40	18	2.13	38	3	.921	20.5	7.23
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	12	4.00	6	2.21	14	1	.929	11.5	7.28
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	1.60	25	7	.720	9.5	5.26
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	8	2.00	22	2	.909	14.5	5.77
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	20	2.31	39	1	.974	16.0	5.63
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	25	2.23	43	2	.953	12.5	4.59
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	18	2.20	35	3	.914	22.5	7.59
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	15	2.11	28	4	.857	7.0	4.25
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	16	2.12	34	2	.941	15.0	7.61
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	14	2.25	24	2	.917	24.0	7.97
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	15	2.35	26	2	.923	18.0	8.63
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.24	17	2	.882	12.5	8.21
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	16	1.85	34	8	.765	19.0	6.01
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	13.0	8.29
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	6	1.50	14	5	.643	13.0	5.80
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	9	2.05	21	0	1.000	17.0	7.91
Total		72	1	30	31	3	0.43	88	1.22	241	2.07	503	54	.893	285.0	6.54