Players

Matthew Comerford 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	15	11	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.23
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	15	.133	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.83
8	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	16	.750	5	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.92
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	8	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.40
11	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	23	.348	4	2	1	0.50	15	.933	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.00
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	0	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.41
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	20	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.17
17	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	16	.688	6	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.06
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	19	.316	11	2	1	0.50	22	.955	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
21	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	7	.429	9	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.78
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	0	18	.833	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.67
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	10	1.000	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.96
26	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	11	.545	7	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	16	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
31	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.51
34	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	18	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.64
39	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	16	.000	7	4	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.39
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.61
Total		74	198	2.68	41	273	.575	78	20	25	0.27	196	.872	.	.	.	.	251.0	6.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.23
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.83
8	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.92
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.40
11	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.00
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.41
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.17
17	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.06
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
21	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.78
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.67
25	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.96
26	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.64
31	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.51
34	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
36	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.64
39	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.39
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.61
Total		74	7	52	59	12	0.80	21	0.28	.	.	.	.	.	251.0	6.64