Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	7.06
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.50
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	8.46
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	4.05
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.40
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	6.28
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	6.20
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	5.80
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	1.000	0.0	4.55
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.15
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	.700	0.0	5.77
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	7	.571	0.0	3.55
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	3.60
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	.667	0.0	5.81
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	4.95
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	.875	0.0	5.99
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.08
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.40
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	6.15
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	5.93
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	.818	0.0	3.78
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	5.85
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	88	1.04	141	.624	0.0	5.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	7.06
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.78	23	3	.870	0.0	4.50
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	7	2.25	12	1	.917	0.0	8.46
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	2.03	30	4	.867	0.0	4.05
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.14	21	1	.952	0.0	3.40
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	8	2.07	15	1	.933	0.0	6.28
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.36	22	2	.909	0.0	6.20
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	2.08	25	2	.920	0.0	5.80
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	1.78	32	5	.844	0.0	4.55
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	18	2.16	31	5	.839	0.0	4.15
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	18	2.33	30	2	.933	0.0	5.77
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	24	2.20	44	3	.932	0.0	3.55
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	18	2.18	34	4	.882	0.0	3.60
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.55	22	1	.955	0.0	5.81
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.30	27	1	.963	0.0	4.95
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	2.37	19	1	.947	0.0	5.99
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.39	18	2	.889	0.0	5.08
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.92	26	2	.923	0.0	4.40
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.30	27	3	.889	0.0	6.15
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	2.39	23	0	1.000	0.0	5.93
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.00	16	1	.938	0.0	3.78
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	16	2.14	35	1	.971	0.0	5.85
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	137	1.61	284	2.17	546	46	.916	0.0	5.24