Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.20
2	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	.545	0.0	6.69
4	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	9	.667	0.0	4.61
6	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	7.03
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	5.93
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	.600	0.0	7.93
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	8	.250	0.0	5.70
12	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	6.15
14	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	3.55
16	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.18
18	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	2	.500	0.0	4.25
19	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	3.68
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	6.10
22	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.50
25	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	5	1.25	5	1.000	0.0	8.03
26	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	10	.800	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	9.54
31	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	2	.500	0.0	4.70
33	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	12	.583	0.0	6.96
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	20	.900	68	1.00	115	.591	0.0	5.93

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.38	13	0	1.000	0.0	6.20
2	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.35	17	1	.941	0.0	6.69
4	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	19	2.29	31	2	.935	0.0	4.61
6	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	24	2.40	40	2	.950	0.0	7.03
8	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.31	13	1	.923	0.0	5.93
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	18	2.38	29	1	.966	0.0	7.93
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	2.00	25	2	.920	0.0	5.70
12	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.30	27	1	.963	0.0	6.15
14	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	14	2.27	30	0	1.000	0.0	3.55
16	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.47	17	1	.941	0.0	5.18
18	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	19	2.32	34	1	.971	0.0	4.25
19	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.05	21	3	.857	0.0	3.68
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.37	19	0	1.000	0.0	6.10
22	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	18	2.32	28	3	.893	0.0	4.50
25	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	14	2.25	28	1	.964	0.0	8.03
26	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.67	12	0	1.000	0.0	9.54
31	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	15	2.21	29	2	.931	0.0	4.70
33	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	19	2.52	29	1	.966	0.0	6.96
Total		68	.	.	.	.	.	122	1.79	251	2.31	442	22	.950	0.0	5.93