Players

Drew Prosser 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	11	15	12	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	7	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.64
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	8	34	.088	6	1	3	0.25	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	5.51
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	2	31	.516	2	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.34
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	19	.316	5	2	4	0.40	15	.733	2	0.40	2	1.000	12.5	3.34
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	8	4	1	1.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.25
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	19	6.33	5	32	.438	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.13
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	4.64
34	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	4	35	.400	2	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.60
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.0	2.96
40	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	26	.308	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	2	0.40	2	1.000	14.0	5.38
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	14	.500	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.78
44	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.95
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	16	.250	2	1	0	0.20	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.42
Total		49	136	2.78	41	261	.364	44	10	26	0.20	152	.829	5	0.10	7	.714	160.5	5.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	9	2.19	16	2	.875	11.0	6.64
6	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	15	2.06	31	3	.903	12.5	5.51
17	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	15	2.30	30	0	1.000	21.5	7.34
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	17	2.03	39	4	.897	12.5	3.34
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	2.07	15	0	1.000	10.5	4.25
29	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	11	2.19	26	2	.923	19.5	8.13
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	12	2.50	18	1	.944	6.0	4.64
34	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	13	2.38	24	1	.958	18.5	7.60
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.04	27	4	.852	4.0	2.96
40	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	12	2.26	23	0	1.000	14.0	5.38
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	12	2.16	25	2	.920	9.0	5.78
44	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	9	2.58	12	0	1.000	10.5	6.95
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	18	2.10	41	5	.878	11.0	3.42
Total		49	1	27	28	1	0.57	46	0.94	163	2.19	327	24	.927	160.5	5.53