Players

Drew Prosser 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	11	15	12	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	18	.667	8	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.75
5	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	2	46	.500	9	5	1	1.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	31.0	7.46
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	5	32	.438	5	0	2	0.00	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	20.0	6.96
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	22	.500	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.15
11	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	6	.667	11	1	1	0.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.74
12	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	21	.381	3	0	3	0.00	16	.813	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	3.76
13	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	2	25	.760	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.5	7.57
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	19	.737	8	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.86
19	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.28
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	27	.481	7	2	4	0.40	18	.778	1	0.20	3	.333	20.5	7.20
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	19	.737	7	0	5	0.00	17	.706	0	0.00	2	.000	16.0	6.55
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	8	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.82
31	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	4	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.76
36	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	1	1	4	0.33	8	.500	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.19
39	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	21	.619	5	0	3	0.00	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.0	6.45
41	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	14	.571	0	0	4	0.00	9	.556	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	3.88
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	24	.208	2	1	4	0.25	11	.636	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.63
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	16	.063	7	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.41
Total		75	236	3.15	46	365	.521	97	19	44	0.25	261	.831	5	0.07	11	.455	282.0	6.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.44	16	1	.938	14.0	8.75
5	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	16	2.03	36	4	.889	31.0	7.46
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	22	2.21	39	5	.872	20.0	6.96
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	5	1.84	19	1	.947	17.0	6.15
11	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	7.0	5.74
12	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	7	1.88	17	3	.824	13.5	3.76
13	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	17	2.11	35	2	.943	22.5	7.57
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	14	2.26	27	2	.926	18.5	7.86
19	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	5	1.71	14	3	.786	9.5	4.28
21	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	9	2.29	17	0	1.000	20.5	7.20
23	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	23	2.23	44	4	.909	16.0	6.55
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	6	2.00	21	1	.952	13.0	6.82
31	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	11	2.21	19	1	.947	13.0	6.86
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	7	2.18	17	1	.941	8.0	3.76
36	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	11	2.20	20	2	.900	8.5	4.19
39	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	20	2.36	33	3	.909	16.0	6.45
41	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	13	2.00	36	3	.917	9.5	3.88
44	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	22	2.30	37	1	.973	16.0	6.63
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	5	1.76	17	3	.824	8.5	3.41
Total		75	0	54	54	2	0.72	58	0.77	228	2.14	473	40	.915	282.0	6.01