Players

Drew Prosser 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	11	15	12	4

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
295 19th	.419 121st	18 127th	85 90th	64 59th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	9	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.00
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	11	-.273	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.43
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	9	1	1	0.33	13	.923	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	4.22
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	3	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.65
7	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	19	.474	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.11
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	4.73
10	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	6	37	.459	7	1	1	0.20	19	.947	1	0.20	1	1.000	25.5	7.77
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	11	46	.087	5	0	2	0.00	16	.875	2	0.40	2	1.000	19.0	7.28
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	1	24	.625	3	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.60
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	19	.684	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.72
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	25	6.25	2	37	.622	7	0	3	0.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	26.5	8.39
19	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	19	.368	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	1	0.33	2	.500	13.0	5.98
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	25	.320	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.87
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	26	5.20	4	36	.611	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	27.5	8.22
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	25	.320	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.86
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	25	.280	6	5	1	1.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.53
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	19	.421	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.90
33	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	22	.500	7	1	4	0.25	17	.765	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.83
34	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	12	-.083	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.82
38	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	25	.520	9	3	2	0.60	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	6.51
41	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	12	.750	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.71
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	14	.500	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.55
44	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	20	.600	3	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.09
46	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	15	.400	4	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.51
Total		87	295	3.39	80	513	.419	112	18	46	0.21	327	.859	6	0.07	9	.667	346.0	6.47

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	12	2.56	16	1	.938	9.5	8.00
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.29	24	2	.917	2.0	3.43
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	7	1.93	15	3	.800	9.5	4.22
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	18	2.32	28	3	.893	10.5	6.65
7	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	13	2.19	32	1	.969	11.5	6.11
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	13	2.57	21	0	1.000	7.5	4.73
10	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	13	2.00	30	4	.867	25.5	7.77
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	21	2.42	33	1	.970	19.0	7.28
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	11	2.08	25	2	.920	19.5	8.60
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	14	2.35	23	1	.957	17.5	8.72
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	14	2.07	30	3	.900	26.5	8.39
19	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	7	1.74	23	4	.826	13.0	5.98
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	16	2.37	27	1	.963	11.5	7.87
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	18	2.24	34	3	.912	27.5	8.22
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	16	2.09	35	4	.886	14.0	4.86
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	7	1.80	20	4	.800	18.5	6.53
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	7	2.06	16	2	.875	11.5	5.90
33	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	15	2.46	24	0	1.000	16.5	7.83
34	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	1.80	20	4	.800	4.0	1.82
38	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	16	2.06	35	5	.857	21.5	6.51
41	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	6	2.29	14	0	1.000	11.5	7.71
43	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	18	2.23	35	1	.971	12.0	5.55
44	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	2.11	19	4	.789	17.0	8.09
46	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	16	2.21	29	1	.966	9.0	4.51
Total		87	2	62	64	3	0.74	85	0.98	310	2.18	608	54	.911	346.0	6.47