Players

Session 13 orders deadline in 31 hours and 54 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Saturday, May 2nd, 2026 - 10:05:15 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Landry Clarke 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	16	17	15	6

Season 15 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
205 83rd	.539 35th	12 196th	65 166th	37 200th

Career Honors

S141st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	25	.520	7	2	4	0.40	16	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	7.82
3	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	6	30	.400	10	0	5	0.00	21	.762	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.94
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	26	.500	13	2	2	0.50	23	.913	1	0.25	1	1.000	20.0	8.52
6	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	26	.500	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.45
8	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	25	.600	5	2	2	0.40	18	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.0	7.59
9	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	5	33	.515	9	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	24.5	9.97
10	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	26	5.20	5	38	.553	6	1	1	0.20	19	.947	.	.	.	.	28.0	7.74
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	17	.588	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.30
17	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.31
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	18	.722	6	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.11
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	22	.727	3	0	4	0.00	14	.714	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.96
31	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	19	.263	10	1	0	0.25	18	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	6.35
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	0	16	.688	10	2	2	0.50	20	.900	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.98
Total		54	205	3.80	39	308	.539	89	12	28	0.22	219	.872	4	0.07	5	.800	236.0	7.70

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	18	2.56	25	1	.960	21.5	7.82
3	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	11	2.26	19	2	.895	20.0	7.94
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	6	2.17	12	1	.917	20.0	8.52
6	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	9	2.25	20	0	1.000	16.5	7.45
8	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	14	2.29	24	3	.875	22.0	7.59
9	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	15	2.68	19	1	.947	24.5	9.97
10	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	4	0.80	11	2.15	27	2	.926	28.0	7.74
12	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	13	2.39	18	1	.944	12.0	6.30
17	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.53	15	1	.933	9.0	6.31
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	17.0	9.11
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	8	2.24	17	0	1.000	18.5	7.96
31	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	7	2.08	12	2	.833	13.0	6.35
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	5	2.38	13	0	1.000	14.0	6.98
Total		54	1	36	37	3	0.69	65	1.20	132	2.34	231	14	.939	236.0	7.70