Players

Career Honors

S141st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	8.61
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	6	1.50	10	.600	0.0	7.42
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	10.00
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	5	1.25	5	1.000	1.0	8.18
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	6.94
9	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	9	2.25	14	.643	0.0	10.00
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	8.08
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	11	.909	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	9.31
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	6.68
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	3	0.50	15	.800	4	1.00	8	.500	2.0	4.85
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	1	0.33	3	.333	1.0	7.48
19	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	8.20
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	4	1.33	4	1.000	2.0	8.34
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	2	0.40	3	.667	1.0	7.53
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	8	2.00	9	.889	1.0	4.11
30	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.50	13	.846	3	0.75	6	.500	2.0	7.03
32	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.80
35	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.20	14	.929	4	0.80	5	.800	1.0	5.38
37	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	4.15
39	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	2.25
40	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	4	1	1.33	12	.917	2	0.67	6	.333	4.0	3.90
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	77	20	25	0.26	224	.888	76	1.00	120	.633	20.0	6.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	7	2.08	13	2	.846	1.0	8.61
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.53	19	1	.947	0.0	7.42
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.89	9	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.75	16	0	1.000	1.0	8.18
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	1.0	6.94
9	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	16	2.80	20	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.55	22	1	.955	1.0	8.08
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.73	11	0	1.000	1.0	9.31
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.69	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.68
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	7	1.81	21	5	.762	2.0	4.85
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	1.0	7.48
19	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.67	15	0	1.000	1.0	8.20
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	4	2.44	9	0	1.000	2.0	8.34
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	2.45	22	1	.955	1.0	7.53
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	2.00	19	4	.789	1.0	4.11
30	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.36	22	1	.955	2.0	7.03
32	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.80
35	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	11	2.47	17	1	.941	1.0	5.38
37	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	2.32	19	1	.947	0.0	4.15
39	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.75	20	4	.800	0.0	2.25
40	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	2.25	8	0	1.000	4.0	3.90
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	144	1.89	206	2.40	335	21	.937	20.0	6.92