Players

Jonathon Tyler 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	13	13	13	13	5

Career Honors

S22nd All-BIG-8

S32nd All-BIG-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	20	.250	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.20
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	7	24	.167	6	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.30
5	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	8	27	.111	6	1	2	0.25	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	6.21
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	7	40	.250	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.5	7.72
8	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	19	.526	13	3	4	0.75	23	.826	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.5	7.71
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	7	34	.265	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.20	2	.500	19.0	6.49
11	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	28	.429	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.5	8.19
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	22	.273	9	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.56
16	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.64
19	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	20	.600	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.0	7.72
24	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	25	.400	6	2	2	0.40	17	.882	1	0.20	2	.500	20.0	6.98
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	13	.000	9	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	7.0	4.43
28	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	6	41	.390	7	1	3	0.20	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	23.5	7.67
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	20	.500	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.66
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	2	32	.531	5	2	3	0.50	14	.786	1	0.25	1	1.000	23.5	8.91
37	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	10	35	.114	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.27
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	19	.368	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.07
42	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	9	30	-.033	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.06
Total		72	226	3.14	87	461	.302	87	15	38	0.21	230	.835	14	0.19	14	1.000	277.5	6.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	3	0.75	13	2.39	23	0	1.000	11.5	5.20
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	10	2.50	12	2.25	24	0	1.000	15.0	7.30
5	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	8	2.05	19	1	.947	13.5	6.21
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	9	2.41	17	0	1.000	17.5	7.72
8	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	12	3.00	16	2.39	28	0	1.000	15.5	7.71
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	12	2.40	16	1.97	38	3	.921	19.0	6.49
11	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	8	2.29	17	0	1.000	16.5	8.19
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	15	2.34	29	2	.931	14.0	6.56
16	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.00	13	3	.769	7.0	3.64
19	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	5	1.25	12	2.25	20	2	.900	16.0	7.72
24	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	4	0.80	16	2.30	30	0	1.000	20.0	6.98
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.00	21	1	.952	7.0	4.43
28	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	16	2.14	36	2	.944	23.5	7.67
29	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	8	2.46	13	0	1.000	16.0	8.66
32	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	6	1.50	19	2.29	35	2	.943	23.5	8.91
37	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	16	2.26	34	1	.971	18.0	6.27
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.33	15	0	1.000	11.5	7.07
42	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	8	1.60	12	2.04	25	3	.880	12.5	4.06
Total		72	2	69	71	5	0.99	114	1.58	218	2.22	437	20	.954	277.5	6.71