Players

Macklin Booth 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	12	14	15	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	18	.167	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.25
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	8	33	.303	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.78
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.03
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	0	24	.583	13	3	0	0.75	24	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.0	8.05
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	21	.429	7	0	1	0.00	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	9.16
9	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	3	31	.484	11	2	3	0.50	21	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	22.5	8.41
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	33	.485	1	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.86
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.77
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	22	.273	2	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.74
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	24	.417	2	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.5	5.18
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	13	.462	8	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.23
19	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	18	.500	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.06
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	25	.400	5	0	3	0.00	11	.727	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.5	8.61
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	1	30	.633	2	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.44
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	24	.417	10	2	1	0.67	18	.944	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.58
32	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	20	.500	7	2	1	0.50	16	.938	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.46
35	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	20	.150	6	1	3	0.20	19	.842	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.70
37	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	5	33	.455	5	0	2	0.00	18	.889	0	0.00	2	.000	20.5	6.91
40	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	22	.227	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.07
Total		68	245	3.60	61	437	.421	94	13	32	0.19	274	.883	4	0.06	7	.571	279.0	6.91

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.33	18	1	.944	9.5	6.25
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	14	2.10	29	3	.897	19.5	7.78
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	8	2.24	17	1	.941	7.5	5.03
6	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	17	2.24	33	1	.970	19.0	8.05
8	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	12	2.30	23	1	.957	14.0	9.16
9	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	13	2.07	27	3	.889	22.5	8.41
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	18	2.20	41	0	1.000	19.5	6.86
12	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	11.5	7.77
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	15	2.19	27	2	.926	13.5	6.74
16	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	15	1.95	40	5	.875	12.5	5.18
17	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.29	17	1	.941	8.0	6.23
19	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.04	23	2	.913	10.5	6.06
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	2.47	15	0	1.000	14.5	8.61
23	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	19	2.07	43	4	.907	21.0	6.44
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	12	2.20	25	2	.920	17.0	8.58
32	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	13	2.29	24	2	.917	18.0	7.46
35	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	18	2.17	29	5	.828	11.0	3.70
37	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	8	1.97	30	2	.933	20.5	6.91
40	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	12	2.22	27	1	.963	9.5	6.07
Total		68	1	40	41	2	0.60	63	0.93	238	2.17	502	36	.928	279.0	6.91