Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.30
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	7.10
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.67	16	.875	3	1.00	4	.750	2.0	7.94
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	5.95
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	5.75
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	4.88
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.85
15	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	2	0.50	12	.833	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	3.90
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	7	.857	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	5.73
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.20	12	.667	1	0.20	4	.250	1.0	5.85
32	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	1	0.33	5	.200	1.0	5.30
Total		37	.	.	.	.	.	31	8	17	0.22	98	.827	22	0.59	55	.400	8.0	5.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.17	12	2	.833	0.0	5.30
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.42	12	1	.917	0.0	7.10
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	8	1.85	20	3	.850	2.0	7.94
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.15	33	2	.939	0.0	5.95
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.29	14	1	.929	0.0	5.75
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	1.0	4.88
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.07	15	2	.867	0.0	4.85
15	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	2.27	26	2	.923	2.0	3.90
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.23	13	1	.923	1.0	5.73
18	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	10	2.29	21	0	1.000	1.0	5.85
32	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.21	14	1	.929	1.0	5.30
Total		37	.	.	.	.	.	74	2.00	98	2.19	192	15	.922	8.0	5.69