Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	7.48
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	4.50
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.67	13	.846	5	1.67	10	.500	2.0	6.43
6	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	4	1	1.33	11	.909	2	0.67	3	.667	4.0	7.88
11	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	4	.250	0.0	3.35
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	9	.778	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	10.00
14	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	1	0.33	4	.250	1.0	7.03
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	6	.833	0.0	4.33
19	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	6.46
20	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	4.36
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	6.98
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	9	.222	0.0	4.08
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	4	0.00	11	.636	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	5.78
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	3.45
31	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	6.00
32	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	5.65
Total		60	.	.	.	.	.	27	7	9	0.12	63	.857	52	0.87	100	.520	7.0	5.86

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	19	2.83	23	0	1.000	0.0	7.48
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	2.18	17	1	.941	0.0	4.50
4	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.21	14	0	1.000	2.0	6.43
6	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.29	17	0	1.000	4.0	7.88
11	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	11	2.21	19	2	.895	0.0	3.35
12	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	8	2.60	10	1	.900	0.0	10.00
14	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.55	11	0	1.000	1.0	7.03
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.33
19	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	2.52	21	1	.952	0.0	6.46
20	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	4.36
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.18	22	0	1.000	0.0	6.98
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15	2.35	26	2	.923	0.0	4.08
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	2	2.00	4	1	.750	0.0	5.78
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	10	2.26	19	1	.947	0.0	3.45
31	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.20	15	1	.933	0.0	6.00
32	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	10	2.26	19	2	.895	0.0	5.65
Total		60	.	.	.	.	.	90	1.50	153	2.35	266	12	.955	7.0	5.86