Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	7.48
4	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	5.30
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.40
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.28
14	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.16
15	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	4	1.33	7	.571	3.0	7.32
18	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	4.85
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	7.95
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	7.56
Total		29	.	.	.	.	.	17	3	6	0.10	41	.854	18	0.62	44	.409	3.0	6.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.47	15	1	.933	0.0	7.48
4	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.20	15	1	.933	0.0	5.30
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.00	19	2	.895	0.0	4.40
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	5.28
14	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.41	27	0	1.000	0.0	5.16
15	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	7	1.94	16	0	1.000	3.0	7.32
18	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.38	16	0	1.000	0.0	4.85
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	13	2.48	21	0	1.000	0.0	7.95
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.56	16	1	.938	0.0	7.56
Total		29	.	.	.	.	.	52	1.79	85	2.31	157	5	.968	3.0	6.14