Players

Matty Thiele 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	17	16	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.49
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.08
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	15	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.51
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	4	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.89
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	14	.643	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	12	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.18
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	0	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.35
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.98
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	19	.684	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.76
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.72
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	19	.526	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.58
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	21	.524	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.68
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	20	.450	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.47
Total		86	217	2.52	50	311	.537	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	268.5	6.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	9	9	1	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.49
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.08
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.51
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	1	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.24
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.89
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.58
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.18
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	2	6	8	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.35
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.98
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.76
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.72
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.58
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.68
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	1	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.47
Total		86	9	85	94	9	1.09	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	268.5	6.22