Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	6	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	37	12.33	62	.597	4.5	9.01
5	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	10	1	2	0.20	23	.913	51	10.20	104	.490	4.5	6.06
8	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	12	3	5	0.60	23	.783	52	10.40	99	.525	5.0	6.40
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	7	2	3	0.50	19	.842	48	12.00	83	.578	4.5	7.27
12	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	8	-.125	11	3	2	0.60	26	.923	64	12.80	112	.571	5.5	8.71
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	30	10.00	60	.500	5.0	5.63
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	6	1	2	0.20	18	.889	62	12.40	106	.585	3.5	7.72
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	8	.500	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	43	14.33	71	.606	6.0	9.06
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	5	.400	1	0	1	0.00	11	.909	44	11.00	77	.571	3.5	4.82
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	25	8.33	57	.439	1.5	3.44
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	9	2	2	0.50	21	.905	46	11.50	84	.548	3.5	6.52
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	41	13.67	62	.661	1.5	8.66
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	8	1	3	0.20	22	.864	69	13.80	110	.627	5.0	9.22
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	7	.000	6	2	1	0.40	20	.950	60	12.00	96	.625	6.5	8.02
38	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	9	.222	3	2	1	0.40	15	.933	51	10.20	109	.468	6.0	5.79
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	48	12.00	90	.533	3.0	7.85
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	4	.750	5	2	0	0.40	17	1.000	58	11.60	90	.644	7.0	6.86
Total		71	31	0.44	12	96	.198	102	22	30	0.31	291	.897	829	11.68	1472	.563	76.0	7.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.01
5	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.06
8	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.40
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.27
12	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.71
13	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.63
15	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.72
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.06
19	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.82
21	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.44
25	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.52
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.66
33	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.22
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.02
38	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.79
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.85
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.86
Total		71	6	34	40	7	0.56	61	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	76.0	7.12