Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.33	9	.111	0.0	6.21
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	3	0.67	12	.750	2	0.67	2	1.000	2.0	5.68
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.00
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	5.10
15	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	1	0.25	6	.167	1.0	5.26
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	5	0.20	17	.706	3	0.60	13	.231	1.0	7.18
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	2	0.67	7	.286	1.0	3.83
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	2	0.50	8	.250	0.0	5.40
33	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	6.88
34	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	4	1	0.80	20	.950	5	1.00	7	.714	4.0	5.38
39	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	6	.667	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	3.60
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	44	11	22	0.28	126	.825	23	0.59	75	.307	11.0	5.50

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	1.86	21	5	.762	0.0	6.21
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	14	1.97	30	5	.833	2.0	5.68
8	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.21	24	1	.958	0.0	6.00
11	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	1.93	28	4	.857	0.0	5.10
15	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	5	1.63	24	2	.917	1.0	5.26
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	21	2.29	35	4	.886	1.0	7.18
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.22	23	2	.913	1.0	3.83
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	17	2.05	38	4	.895	0.0	5.40
33	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	14	2.07	27	4	.852	1.0	6.88
34	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	16	1.87	38	5	.868	4.0	5.38
39	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.17	29	3	.897	1.0	3.60
Total		39	.	.	.	.	.	85	2.18	145	2.03	317	39	.877	11.0	5.50