Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	6	1.20	9	.667	1.0	6.15
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	0	0.67	17	1.000	2	0.67	8	.250	2.0	7.74
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	14	.929	4	1.00	7	.571	1.0	5.65
6	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.66
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.20	20	.900	5	1.00	11	.455	1.0	6.20
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	1	0.67	16	.938	6	2.00	8	.750	2.0	9.00
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.25	20	1.000	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	6.33
11	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	5.90
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	8.74
16	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	6	0.40	19	.684	4	0.80	4	1.000	2.0	6.05
17	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.40	20	.900	2	0.40	11	.182	2.0	6.43
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	2	0.33	19	.895	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	7.81
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	5.68
25	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	12	.750	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	8.81
29	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	4	0.80	5	.800	1.0	7.14
31	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.67	17	.882	8	2.67	9	.889	2.0	8.34
34	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.20	20	.950	5	1.00	6	.833	1.0	4.80
39	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	1	0.50	22	.955	8	2.00	11	.727	2.0	8.05
44	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	9	2.25	11	.818	1.0	4.18
46	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.67	10	.800	3	1.00	4	.750	2.0	4.30
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	133	24	33	0.32	319	.897	86	1.13	135	.637	24.0	6.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	16	2.17	30	5	.833	1.0	6.15
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.53	19	0	1.000	2.0	7.74
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.03	31	3	.903	1.0	5.65
6	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	16	2.27	26	4	.846	0.0	6.66
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	25	2.29	41	4	.902	1.0	6.20
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	8	2.25	16	0	1.000	2.0	9.00
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	13	1.92	36	3	.917	1.0	6.33
11	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.29	21	3	.857	1.0	5.90
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	5	2.17	12	1	.917	0.0	8.74
16	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	24	2.25	40	2	.950	2.0	6.05
17	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	20	2.24	37	2	.946	2.0	6.43
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	1.95	22	3	.864	1.0	7.81
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.07	30	3	.900	1.0	5.68
25	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	2.44	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.81
29	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	24	2.52	33	2	.939	1.0	7.14
31	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.15	20	3	.850	2.0	8.34
34	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	19	2.22	36	0	1.000	1.0	4.80
39	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	18	2.17	36	4	.889	2.0	8.05
44	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.04	27	4	.852	1.0	4.18
46	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.15	27	3	.889	2.0	4.30
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	182	2.39	297	2.20	558	49	.912	24.0	6.70