Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.13
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	3.30
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	19	.895	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	7.63
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.95
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	3.95
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.40	18	.833	6	1.20	11	.545	2.0	8.37
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.20	21	.952	5	1.00	8	.625	1.0	3.95
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	8.56
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	8.23
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	9	2.25	10	.900	0.0	9.42
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	9	.778	2	0.50	2	1.000	1.0	5.63
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	5	0.33	14	.643	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	8.05
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	2	0.33	16	.875	9	3.00	15	.600	1.0	8.12
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	12	.667	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	3.70
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	9.65
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	6.65
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	6	1.50	10	.600	0.0	9.82
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	16	.875	1	0.20	9	.111	0.0	5.80
Total		67	.	.	.	.	.	77	8	37	0.12	230	.839	63	0.94	111	.568	8.0	6.77

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	1.90	20	2	.900	0.0	6.13
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.96	23	2	.913	1.0	3.30
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	17	3.40	15	2.00	33	3	.909	1.0	7.63
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	15	2.03	30	4	.867	0.0	4.95
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.08	25	3	.880	0.0	3.95
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	19	3.80	18	2.29	38	1	.974	2.0	8.37
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.14	35	4	.886	1.0	3.95
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	14	2.25	24	1	.958	0.0	8.56
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	4	2.29	7	0	1.000	0.0	8.23
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	9.42
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.47	19	0	1.000	1.0	5.63
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.24	17	1	.941	1.0	8.05
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	1.0	8.12
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	10	2.25	16	2	.875	0.0	3.70
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	11	2.60	15	0	1.000	0.0	9.65
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.65
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	12	2.67	18	0	1.000	0.0	9.82
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	10	2.15	20	1	.950	0.0	5.80
Total		67	.	.	.	.	.	162	2.42	207	2.23	385	24	.938	8.0	6.77