Players

Baker Bender 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	11	11	12	15

Season 4 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,016 2nd	37 162nd	29 9th	95 58th	46 73rd

Career Honors

S42nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	7	.286	15	2	3	0.50	24	.875	40	10.00	73	.548	5.5	6.89
2	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	14	3	4	0.75	26	.846	54	13.50	94	.574	5.5	9.46
5	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	13	1	2	0.20	26	.923	58	11.60	117	.496	1.5	6.98
6	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	4	.250	11	1	1	0.25	19	.947	49	12.25	81	.605	4.0	8.76
8	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	46	11.50	70	.657	4.5	7.00
9	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	9	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	29	9.67	55	.527	4.0	6.73
11	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	1	1	3	0.33	10	.700	37	12.33	52	.712	1.5	6.58
15	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	7	3	4	1.00	15	.733	32	10.67	59	.542	8.5	7.26
17	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	5	1	2	0.20	19	.895	57	11.40	104	.548	4.0	6.62
19	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	1	0	0.20	22	1.000	58	11.60	106	.547	2.0	6.40
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	5	1	5	0.25	16	.688	48	12.00	93	.516	4.5	7.66
22	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	44	14.67	72	.611	0.0	7.84
24	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	10	0	2	0.00	18	.889	41	13.67	65	.631	2.5	10.00
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	6	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	54	13.50	99	.545	3.0	9.32
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	8	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	44	14.67	69	.638	5.0	10.00
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	9	2	2	0.50	21	.905	49	12.25	98	.500	4.0	7.16
32	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	8	.125	7	1	3	0.25	19	.842	51	12.75	95	.537	4.0	8.33
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	11	2	2	0.67	18	.889	37	12.33	65	.569	5.5	9.93
38	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	16	2	2	0.67	22	.909	43	14.33	59	.729	6.0	10.00
40	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	44	11.00	79	.557	3.5	5.40
41	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	1	3	0.33	14	.786	40	13.33	66	.606	3.0	8.89
43	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	6	.667	8	4	2	0.80	22	.909	61	12.20	95	.642	8.5	7.76
Total		83	37	0.45	9	102	.275	179	29	48	0.35	401	.880	1016	12.24	1766	.575	90.5	7.95

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 4)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.89
2	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.46
5	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.98
6	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.76
8	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.00
9	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.73
11	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.58
15	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.26
17	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.62
19	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.40
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.66
22	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.84
24	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	10.00
26	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.32
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	10.00
30	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.16
32	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.33
35	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.93
38	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	10.00
40	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.40
41	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.89
43	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.76
Total		83	3	43	46	3	0.55	95	1.14	.	.	.	.	.	90.5	7.95