Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	8	5	2	1.67	15	.867	23	7.67	74	.311	7.0	4.14
8	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	3	1	1	0.25	14	.929	38	9.50	90	.422	2.0	4.54
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	6	-.333	5	2	1	0.67	12	.917	27	9.00	59	.458	3.0	4.51
13	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	23	7.67	62	.371	0.5	3.38
15	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	26	8.67	67	.388	1.5	4.48
18	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	9	0	3	0.00	22	.864	75	18.75	103	.728	0.0	8.16
29	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	27	9.00	58	.466	2.0	3.46
Total		23	3	0.13	6	31	-.097	32	9	10	0.39	93	.892	239	10.39	513	.466	16.0	4.67

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.14
8	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.54
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.51
13	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.38
15	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.48
18	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	8.16
29	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.46
Total		23	1	6	7	1	0.30	16	0.70	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	4.67