Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	7.36
6	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	7	1.40	10	.700	0.0	4.40
7	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	5.63
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	4.38
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	5.05
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	5.05
21	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	4.35
26	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	4.15
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	6	.833	4	1.33	5	.800	1.0	3.33
46	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	8.89
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	26	3	14	0.09	96	.854	34	0.97	61	.557	3.0	5.26

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	13	2.08	25	2	.920	0.0	7.36
6	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	16	1.87	39	5	.872	0.0	4.40
7	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.10	29	3	.897	1.0	5.63
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.33	15	2	.867	0.0	4.38
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	1.95	21	2	.905	0.0	5.05
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	1.92	25	3	.880	0.0	5.05
21	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	1.91	35	6	.829	0.0	4.35
26	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	17	2.16	32	4	.875	0.0	4.15
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	1.93	27	6	.778	1.0	3.33
46	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	13	2.33	21	1	.952	1.0	8.89
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	62	1.77	126	2.03	269	34	.874	3.0	5.26