Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.95
5	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	0.0	9.76
7	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	4	1	1.00	23	.957	3	0.75	9	.333	4.0	7.91
11	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.00
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	5	1.67	10	.500	0.0	6.31
16	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	8.45
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.95
21	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	7	1.40	15	.467	1.0	6.00
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	3	0.67	8	.625	4	1.33	7	.571	2.0	9.41
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	5.20
34	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	11	2.20	14	.786	0.0	8.09
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	30	7	13	0.18	95	.863	43	1.13	79	.544	7.0	7.00

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.21	14	0	1.000	0.0	5.95
5	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.63	16	0	1.000	0.0	9.76
7	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	10	2.31	16	1	.938	4.0	7.91
11	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.16	19	2	.895	0.0	6.00
13	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.29	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.31
16	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.71	14	0	1.000	0.0	8.45
18	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.25	8	1	.875	0.0	3.95
21	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	10	2.11	18	3	.833	1.0	6.00
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.54	13	0	1.000	2.0	9.41
30	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	0.0	5.20
34	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	21	2.64	28	1	.964	0.0	8.09
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	83	2.18	111	2.39	176	8	.955	7.0	7.00