Players

Erik Gray 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	-	-	16	14

Season 16 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
178 7th	2.43 8th	.957 30th	95 72nd	17 127th

Career Honors

S152nd All-BIG-EAST

S161st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	0	0.67	18	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	2.0	6.38
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	1	0.33	5	.200	1.0	8.49
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	1.000	0.0	10.00
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	.643	0.0	5.81
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	5.98
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	5.30
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	7	1.75	11	.636	0.0	9.07
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	7.58
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	6.23
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	9.23
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	5	1.67	5	1.000	1.0	10.00
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	9.35
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	0	1.00	14	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	3.0	10.00
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	5	0.25	18	.722	6	1.50	7	.857	1.0	8.82
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	7.48
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	5	2	1.00	23	.913	4	0.80	6	.667	5.0	4.85
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	7.98
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	7	1.75	8	.875	0.0	6.47
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	9	.778	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	3.78
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	7	1.75	12	.583	1.0	5.79
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	12	.750	8	2.67	9	.889	0.0	8.91
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	5.38
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	.556	0.0	5.00
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	87	17	22	0.21	208	.894	95	1.16	139	.683	17.0	7.30

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.25	16	0	1.000	2.0	6.38
2	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.65	17	0	1.000	1.0	8.49
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	6	2.86	7	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	14	2.55	20	1	.950	0.0	5.81
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	18	2.45	31	1	.968	0.0	5.98
8	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.28	25	2	.920	0.0	5.30
10	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	16	2.88	17	0	1.000	0.0	9.07
12	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.46	13	0	1.000	0.0	7.58
13	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.54	13	0	1.000	1.0	6.23
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.62	13	0	1.000	1.0	9.23
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	10	2.53	15	1	.933	1.0	10.00
19	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	5	2.43	7	0	1.000	0.0	9.35
22	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	18	6.00	8	2.54	13	0	1.000	3.0	10.00
23	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	12	2.37	19	2	.895	1.0	8.82
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.72	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.48
27	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	13	2.18	22	2	.909	5.0	4.85
29	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	7.98
32	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	5	1.95	20	2	.900	0.0	6.47
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.20	15	1	.933	1.0	3.78
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	2.23	13	2	.846	1.0	5.79
39	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.50	12	0	1.000	0.0	8.91
44	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	8	2.35	17	1	.941	0.0	5.38
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	12	2.44	18	1	.944	0.0	5.00
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	178	2.17	232	2.43	372	16	.957	17.0	7.30