Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	15	4	2	0.80	28	.929	48	9.60	118	.407	6.0	5.89
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	20	6.67	59	.339	0.0	2.12
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	2	.000	3	1	2	0.25	12	.833	33	8.25	88	.375	3.0	3.58
9	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	6	1	1	0.25	19	.947	42	10.50	100	.420	2.5	5.94
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	18	6.00	65	.277	0.0	1.24
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	8	-.250	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	20	6.67	64	.313	2.0	4.35
17	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	8	-.250	7	2	3	0.40	20	.850	55	11.00	95	.579	3.5	5.74
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	12	.167	12	2	4	0.50	25	.840	46	11.50	88	.523	7.0	8.61
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	32	10.67	66	.485	1.0	5.39
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	30	10.00	56	.536	2.0	4.00
25	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	20	6.67	58	.345	2.5	2.74
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	33	11.00	69	.478	0.0	4.62
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	3	10	-.200	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	36	9.00	85	.424	4.0	5.46
34	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	22	7.33	64	.344	4.5	3.32
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	1	3	0.33	17	.824	40	13.33	57	.702	2.5	9.68
Total		53	14	0.26	14	81	.000	74	14	32	0.26	214	.850	495	9.34	1132	.437	40.5	4.85

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.89
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.12
3	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.58
9	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.94
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.24
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.35
17	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.74
18	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.61
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.39
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.00
25	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.74
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.62
29	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.46
34	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.32
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.68
Total		53	0	25	25	3	0.47	61	1.15	.	.	.	.	.	40.5	4.85