Players

Victor Patterson 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	13	17	16

Season 14 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,252 1st	43 297th	38 12th	116 33rd	45 158th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	25	8.33	62	.403	3.0	4.18
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	8	.125	6	0	2	0.00	18	.889	40	10.00	97	.412	3.5	5.68
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	11	2	2	0.67	17	.882	30	10.00	50	.600	4.5	7.21
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	1	1	1	0.25	6	.833	45	11.25	66	.682	3.0	6.44
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	3	-.333	6	3	1	1.00	10	.900	33	11.00	61	.541	6.5	7.05
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	7	0	4	0.00	21	.810	69	13.80	95	.726	4.0	8.97
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	6	1	5	0.25	15	.667	45	11.25	71	.634	2.5	6.50
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	30	10.00	42	.714	4.0	7.14
12	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	39	13.00	53	.736	0.5	7.96
13	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	7	.571	11	6	1	1.20	20	.950	53	10.60	87	.609	11.0	5.97
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	3	2	1.00	14	.857	44	14.67	72	.611	3.5	9.04
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	3	1	1	0.25	12	.917	55	13.75	87	.632	4.5	9.00
17	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	4	1.000	10	2	0	0.40	19	1.000	54	10.80	104	.519	6.0	6.22
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	3	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	40	13.33	58	.690	5.0	9.03
22	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	10	-.100	10	2	1	0.40	23	.957	46	9.20	85	.541	4.5	5.14
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	2	0.67	19	.895	42	14.00	49	.857	2.0	9.11
26	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	13	4	3	1.33	22	.864	40	13.33	80	.500	5.0	8.33
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	6	1	3	0.25	19	.842	69	17.25	99	.697	5.5	9.08
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	3	1.000	4	2	0	0.50	13	1.000	54	13.50	99	.545	5.5	8.68
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	39	13.00	57	.684	3.5	9.20
36	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	46	15.33	75	.613	1.5	8.22
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	7	0	3	0.00	22	.864	71	14.20	101	.703	3.0	8.42
39	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	46	11.50	75	.613	2.5	6.66
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	1	0.00	11	.909	39	13.00	59	.661	1.0	8.61
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	1	0	1	0.00	11	.909	41	13.67	62	.661	3.5	7.84
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	6	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	64	12.80	101	.634	2.0	7.62
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	6	2	5	0.50	18	.722	53	13.25	75	.707	4.0	7.88
Total		101	43	0.43	12	119	.261	177	38	43	0.38	420	.898	1252	12.40	2022	.619	105.0	7.60

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.18
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.68
4	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.21
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.44
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.05
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.97
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.50
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.14
12	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	7.96
13	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.97
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.04
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.00
17	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.22
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.03
22	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.14
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.11
26	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.33
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.08
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.68
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.20
36	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.22
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.42
39	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.66
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.61
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.84
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.62
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.88
Total		101	3	42	45	8	0.45	116	1.15	.	.	.	.	.	105.0	7.60