Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	7	19	.000	8	1	4	0.20	17	.765	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.0	4.34
6	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	24	.375	7	2	2	0.40	18	.889	.	.	.	.	18.0	5.97
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	5.04
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.67
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	21	.333	5	2	1	0.40	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	5.49
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	9	21	.048	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.19
21	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	35	.314	4	1	2	0.25	16	.875	1	0.25	2	.500	19.5	7.75
25	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	22	.455	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	0	0.00	2	.000	15.0	7.77
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	23	.217	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.79
30	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	15	.267	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.46
Total		37	102	2.76	48	209	.258	43	10	16	0.27	133	.880	2	0.05	8	.250	129.5	6.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	7	1.40	7	2.05	21	2	.905	12.0	4.34
6	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	8	1.60	15	2.10	30	3	.900	18.0	5.97
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	5	2.36	11	0	1.000	7.0	5.04
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	10.0	6.67
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	9	1.80	11	2.39	18	1	.944	15.5	5.49
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.08	13	1	.923	10.0	6.19
21	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	13	2.27	26	1	.962	19.5	7.75
25	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	15	2.48	23	0	1.000	15.0	7.77
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	6	2.20	15	1	.933	13.0	7.79
30	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	4	1.79	14	1	.929	9.5	4.46
Total		37	2	31	33	3	0.89	50	1.35	90	2.22	183	10	.945	129.5	6.15