Players

Ian Bacon 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	16	16	15	11	4

Season 16 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
201 94th	.363 159th	21 91st	69 157th	56 94th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.33
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.0	8.32
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	24	.208	3	0	5	0.00	14	.643	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.38
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	17	.471	7	1	3	0.33	15	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.0	8.47
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	15	.267	12	3	1	0.60	26	.962	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	3.79
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	1	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.25
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	14	.000	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	2	0.67	2	1.000	4.0	3.25
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	10	.200	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	5.36
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.81
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	5	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.00
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	22	.182	7	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.31
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	13	.538	4	1	5	0.33	13	.615	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.75
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	15	.400	8	1	3	0.25	20	.850	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.73
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.73
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	29	.276	1	1	3	0.20	10	.700	1	0.20	3	.333	15.5	5.68
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	9	.444	18	2	2	0.50	26	.923	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	4.32
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	6	23	.348	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.93
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	13	.538	8	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.89
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	14	.500	7	3	4	0.75	17	.765	1	0.25	3	.333	12.0	5.34
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	9	.556	6	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.55
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.31
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	20	.400	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	6.52
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	18	.556	7	2	3	0.40	16	.813	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.25
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	16	.313	2	2	4	0.40	13	.692	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.33
Total		86	201	2.34	66	372	.363	123	21	58	0.24	323	.820	9	0.10	14	.643	250.0	5.53

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	2	2.11	9	0	1.000	12.0	7.33
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	8	2.80	10	0	1.000	12.0	8.32
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	14	2.52	23	0	1.000	10.0	5.38
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	12	2.67	15	0	1.000	13.0	8.47
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	8	2.13	16	1	.938	10.0	3.79
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	8	2.31	13	0	1.000	11.5	6.25
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	4.0	3.25
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	7	2.50	12	0	1.000	8.5	5.36
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	10	2.91	11	0	1.000	9.5	6.81
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	6	2.06	17	1	.941	9.5	5.00
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	6	2.08	12	2	.833	10.5	5.31
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.22	18	0	1.000	9.0	5.75
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	12	2.35	20	2	.900	11.0	5.73
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	7	2.08	13	2	.846	3.5	2.73
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	15	2.46	24	1	.958	15.5	5.68
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	7	2.07	15	2	.867	9.0	4.32
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	7	2.22	18	0	1.000	15.5	7.93
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	6	2.00	14	1	.929	9.5	5.89
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	9	2.50	12	1	.917	12.0	5.34
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	14	2.58	19	1	.947	9.0	6.55
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	6	1.89	18	1	.944	7.5	3.31
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	18	2.23	30	3	.900	13.0	6.52
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	15	1.95	38	4	.895	15.0	4.25
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	22	2.36	36	2	.944	10.0	3.33
Total		86	0	56	56	3	0.65	69	0.80	232	2.29	423	24	.943	250.0	5.53