Players

Weyland Bishop 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	16	9	14	9	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	25	.320	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.33
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	12	.000	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	4.64
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	30	.333	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	6.90
6	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	21	.381	5	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.87
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	8	41	.341	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	24.5	6.73
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	20	.550	2	1	2	0.33	6	.667	1	0.33	3	.333	15.0	8.64
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	30	.467	9	0	1	0.00	19	.947	2	0.50	2	1.000	21.0	8.82
11	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	6	26	.231	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.74
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	14	.429	6	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.44
16	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	8	30	.033	2	0	5	0.00	12	.583	1	0.20	2	.500	11.5	4.58
17	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	13	37	.000	10	2	3	0.40	19	.842	0	0.00	2	.000	16.5	6.23
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	13	.308	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.04
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	25	.200	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	0	0.00	2	.000	10.5	5.66
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	19	.316	1	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.85
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	8	25	.160	2	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.39
36	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	29	.448	3	0	8	0.00	16	.500	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	7.71
46	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	25	.240	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	7.09
Total		63	207	3.29	91	422	.275	54	7	32	0.11	184	.826	5	0.08	15	.333	237.0	6.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	17	2.61	23	0	1.000	14.0	5.33
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	4	2.22	9	0	1.000	5.5	4.64
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	10	2.47	19	0	1.000	15.0	6.90
6	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	.	.	11	2.50	18	1	.944	13.0	7.87
7	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	2	0.40	13	1.91	32	5	.844	24.5	6.73
8	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	10	2.91	11	0	1.000	15.0	8.64
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	16	2.12	34	4	.882	21.0	8.82
11	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	18	2.41	29	1	.966	12.5	7.74
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	12	2.43	21	0	1.000	11.5	7.44
16	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	24	2.41	37	3	.919	11.5	4.58
17	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	12	2.31	26	0	1.000	16.5	6.23
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	8	2.36	14	0	1.000	9.0	6.04
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	12	2.19	21	2	.905	10.5	5.66
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.45	11	1	.909	12.0	6.85
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	6	2.30	10	1	.900	13.5	7.39
36	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	6	1.20	17	2.38	29	2	.931	20.5	7.71
46	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	2.31	13	0	1.000	11.5	7.09
Total		63	4	38	42	6	0.67	55	0.87	206	2.34	357	20	.944	237.0	6.80