Players

Laurent Rossard 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
9	-	12	10	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	9	-.444	1	0	4	0.00	5	.200	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.18
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	4	13	-.154	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.05
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.85
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	11	.091	0	0	4	0.00	7	.429	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.44
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	7	-.429	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.90
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	9	.111	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.27
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.65
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	5	15	.000	8	3	3	0.60	20	.850	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.13
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.55
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	13	.000	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.57
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.45
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	8	.000	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.46
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	13	.000	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.00
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	4	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.34
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	11	-.273	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
Total		57	54	0.95	49	159	.031	50	9	38	0.16	166	.771	.	.	.	.	84.0	4.05

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.18
3	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	2	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.05
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.85
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.44
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.90
10	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
11	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.27
13	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.65
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.13
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.55
18	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.57
21	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.45
25	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.46
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.00
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.34
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.92
Total		57	5	32	37	6	0.65	12	0.21	.	.	.	.	.	84.0	4.05