Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	11	2	1	0.67	18	.944	36	12.00	57	.632	4.5	8.54
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	22	7.33	58	.379	2.0	2.32
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	30	10.00	70	.429	1.0	4.32
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	3	2	2	0.67	12	.833	37	12.33	48	.771	5.5	8.20
14	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	29	9.67	66	.439	2.0	5.39
15	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	3	0	4	0.00	15	.733	51	10.20	111	.459	3.5	5.78
18	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	9	3	2	0.60	23	.913	46	9.20	92	.500	6.0	4.96
29	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	41	13.67	77	.532	1.0	8.91
39	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	6	0	2	0.00	19	.895	49	9.80	92	.533	0.5	4.08
41	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	10	0	4	0.00	24	.833	57	11.40	101	.564	3.5	7.15
Total		38	10	0.26	4	39	.154	51	7	24	0.18	150	.840	398	10.47	772	.516	29.5	5.97

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.54
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.32
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.32
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.20
14	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.39
15	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.78
18	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.96
29	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.91
39	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.08
41	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.15
Total		38	1	23	24	4	0.63	28	0.74	.	.	.	.	.	29.5	5.97