Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	11	.364	10	1	3	0.25	19	.842	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.29
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	18	.389	11	0	3	0.00	23	.870	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.00
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	18	.389	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	4.59
5	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.12
10	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	8	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.58
11	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	17	.412	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.25
13	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	14	.714	3	2	2	0.67	8	.750	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.77
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.67	2	1.000	4.5	3.78
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	24	.167	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.0	7.56
Total		31	76	2.45	24	145	.359	50	5	19	0.16	122	.844	3	0.10	4	.750	92.5	5.66

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	13	2.35	20	0	1.000	10.5	5.29
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	18	2.38	29	1	.966	9.0	5.00
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	1.92	26	3	.885	9.0	4.59
5	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	4	2.00	12	1	.917	9.5	6.12
10	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	20	2.23	35	5	.857	12.0	4.58
11	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	11.0	7.25
13	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	9	2.10	20	1	.950	15.0	6.77
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	9	2.17	18	1	.944	4.5	3.78
21	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.64	11	1	.909	12.0	7.56
Total		31	1	21	22	3	0.71	24	0.77	100	2.23	181	13	.928	92.5	5.66