Players

Mikel Lambert 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	13	13

Season 3 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
731 14th	33 159th	29 7th	105 74th	40 99th

Career Honors

S32nd All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	9	2	2	0.67	17	.882	25	8.33	85	.294	3.5	4.83
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	33	11.00	82	.402	2.5	6.44
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.67	12	.917	26	8.67	74	.351	3.0	4.22
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	10	1	3	0.20	24	.875	49	9.80	120	.408	5.0	6.43
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	1	3	0.25	20	.850	43	10.75	115	.374	1.5	5.78
10	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	9	2	3	0.50	20	.850	42	10.50	110	.382	5.0	6.38
13	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	6	.167	13	2	1	0.50	21	.952	39	9.75	91	.429	7.0	7.16
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	2	8	.125	13	1	3	0.20	26	.885	44	8.80	126	.349	5.0	5.10
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	18	3	1	1.00	24	.958	23	7.67	67	.343	5.0	5.58
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	2	4	0.67	10	.600	21	7.00	70	.300	3.0	3.27
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	4	0	3	0.00	18	.833	58	11.60	128	.453	3.5	7.54
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	32	8.00	89	.360	7.5	4.57
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	9	1	2	0.33	18	.889	36	12.00	71	.507	4.0	8.80
28	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	8	.125	5	2	2	0.40	18	.889	45	9.00	110	.409	5.0	4.46
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	22	7.33	62	.355	3.0	2.80
33	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	7	.000	9	1	1	0.25	20	.950	38	9.50	101	.376	2.0	5.40
35	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	3	0.33	9	.667	26	8.67	62	.419	1.0	2.76
36	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	8	3	2	1.00	14	.857	37	12.33	64	.578	4.0	8.75
38	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	10	.300	9	1	4	0.25	22	.818	45	11.25	94	.479	5.0	7.06
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	19	6.33	70	.271	5.0	3.48
43	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	0	0	3	0.00	9	.667	28	9.33	66	.424	3.0	4.83
Total		77	33	0.43	13	98	.204	144	29	48	0.38	344	.860	731	9.49	1857	.394	83.5	5.51

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.83
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.44
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.22
6	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.43
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.78
10	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.38
13	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.16
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.10
17	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.58
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.27
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	12	2.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.54
22	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.57
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.80
28	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.46
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.80
33	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.40
35	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.76
36	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.75
38	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.06
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.48
43	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.83
Total		77	3	37	40	7	0.52	105	1.36	.	.	.	.	.	83.5	5.51