Players

Peter Venkman Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	17	18	17	9

Career Honors

S161st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	30	.333	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.48
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	23	.217	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.25	2	.500	10.5	5.45
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	12	25	-.320	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	2.59
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	1	18	.722	7	0	3	0.00	18	.833	1	0.20	3	.333	15.5	6.37
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	15	.267	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	4.56
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	17	.647	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.84
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	6	27	.370	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.5	8.60
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	20	.550	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.02
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	17	.529	1	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	7.91
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	18	.167	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.74
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	27	.148	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.44
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	20	-.050	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.51
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	15	.133	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.91
38	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	16	.563	13	2	5	0.50	24	.792	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.26
39	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	27	6.75	10	44	.386	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	29.0	7.96
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	19	.211	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	2	1.000	9.0	4.37
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	10	2	1	0.67	16	.938	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.78
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	32	.500	6	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.92
Total		63	208	3.30	80	401	.319	72	10	34	0.16	211	.839	5	0.08	12	.417	235.5	5.93

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	20	2.34	32	1	.969	15.0	7.48
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	17	2.22	32	3	.906	10.5	5.45
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	13	1.96	28	3	.893	5.5	2.59
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	15	2.20	30	1	.967	15.5	6.37
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.00	12	1	.917	8.0	4.56
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	7	1.85	20	3	.850	11.5	5.84
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	16	2.41	27	1	.963	16.5	8.60
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	10	1.90	29	5	.828	16.5	6.02
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	7	2.42	12	1	.917	13.5	7.91
16	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	1.68	22	2	.909	9.0	3.74
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.04	25	2	.920	10.5	5.44
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	1.95	19	1	.947	8.5	4.51
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.08	24	1	.958	7.0	3.91
38	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	13	2.15	27	2	.926	13.5	6.26
39	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	17	2.11	37	2	.946	29.0	7.96
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.04	24	3	.875	9.0	4.37
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	7	2.00	17	1	.941	15.0	7.78
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	10	2.00	18	2.11	35	4	.886	21.5	7.92
Total		63	2	31	33	6	0.52	72	1.14	209	2.09	452	37	.918	235.5	5.93