Players

Xavier Esposito Senior Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	9	16	17

Season 15 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,142 1st	31 319th	32 34th	79 106th	48 140th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	14	2	5	0.40	27	.815	44	8.80	99	.444	6.0	5.86
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	11	1	2	0.25	21	.905	49	12.25	85	.576	2.0	7.99
4	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	17	3	3	1.00	23	.870	32	10.67	52	.615	4.5	6.77
6	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	6	1	3	0.25	19	.842	52	13.00	90	.578	3.5	8.68
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	14	1	1	0.33	20	.950	36	12.00	50	.720	2.5	8.25
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	6	3	0	1.00	13	1.000	32	10.67	42	.762	5.5	7.20
10	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	9	1	1	0.25	21	.952	56	14.00	87	.644	2.0	8.64
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	3	2	1.00	17	.882	38	12.67	51	.745	5.0	9.08
14	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	12	1	3	0.25	23	.870	56	14.00	79	.709	4.5	10.00
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	59	14.75	90	.656	2.0	8.82
19	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	8	.375	6	1	3	0.20	20	.850	57	11.40	93	.613	6.0	6.60
20	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	3	8	-.375	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	52	13.00	82	.634	2.5	8.12
22	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	9	3	6	0.60	23	.739	51	10.20	91	.560	5.0	5.83
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	0	0	4	0.00	10	.600	38	12.67	61	.623	1.5	6.86
25	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	6	.167	6	2	1	0.50	17	.941	51	12.75	63	.810	4.0	7.46
30	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	7	1	3	0.25	19	.842	57	14.25	81	.704	5.5	9.91
33	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	7	.143	6	2	3	0.40	21	.857	60	12.00	103	.583	4.0	6.64
34	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	6	.333	6	3	4	0.60	21	.810	62	12.40	86	.721	6.5	7.24
35	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	9	1	1	0.25	19	.947	54	13.50	78	.692	2.0	8.94
39	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	8	.000	1	0	4	0.00	14	.714	62	12.40	93	.667	4.5	7.29
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	3	1	2	0.33	13	.846	48	16.00	72	.667	4.0	9.10
44	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	32	10.67	56	.571	3.0	6.03
45	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	6	1	2	0.25	19	.895	64	16.00	96	.667	2.0	8.42
Total		91	31	0.34	11	106	.189	171	32	56	0.35	425	.868	1142	12.55	1780	.642	88.0	7.81

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 15)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.86
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.99
4	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.77
6	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.68
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.25
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.20
10	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.64
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.08
14	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	10.00
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.82
19	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.60
20	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.12
22	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.83
23	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.86
25	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.46
30	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.91
33	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.64
34	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.24
35	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.94
39	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.29
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.10
44	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.03
45	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.42
Total		91	2	46	48	10	0.53	79	0.87	.	.	.	.	.	88.0	7.81