Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Friday, May 1st, 2026 - 10:50:14 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Shiloh Craig 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	5	-

Season 2 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
92 112th	.209 115th	16 81st	22 196th	46 69th

Career Honors

S32nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 2)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	18	-.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.06
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	13	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.05
8	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.06
11	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	6	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.08
13	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.15
18	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	15	.267	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.58
20	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	15	.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.12
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.52
24	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.77
25	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
28	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
32	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.06
33	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	6	11	-.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.76
36	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	16	.188	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.58
41	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	13	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.79
Total		61	92	1.51	51	196	.209	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	134.0	5.27

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 2)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.06
5	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	4	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.05
8	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.06
11	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.08
13	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.41
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.15
18	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.58
20	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.12
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.52
24	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.77
25	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
28	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
32	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.06
33	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	2	6	8	0	1.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.76
36	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.58
41	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.79
Total		61	6	40	46	9	0.75	22	0.36	.	.	.	.	.	134.0	5.27