Players

Shiloh Craig 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	5	-

Season 3 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
122 89th	.281 61st	20 41st	29 186th	78 6th

Career Honors

S32nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	11	.091	12	4	0	1.33	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.86
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.32
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	9	-.222	7	0	8	0.00	17	.529	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.85
7	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.03
9	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	6	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.46
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	8	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.39
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.60
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	3	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.57
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.18
19	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	10	2	4	0.67	16	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.56
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	8	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.84
23	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	19	.421	4	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.12
24	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.67
26	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	12	.000	5	2	4	0.50	15	.733	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
28	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	5	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.71
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	11	.000	6	1	4	0.20	19	.789	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.60
32	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	12	.167	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.13
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.88
35	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	14	.000	7	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.06
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	13	.385	3	1	4	0.25	10	.600	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.42
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	14	.071	8	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.09
Total		74	122	1.65	52	249	.281	119	20	56	0.27	296	.811	.	.	.	.	184.0	6.56

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 3)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.86
4	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.32
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.85
7	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.03
9	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.46
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.39
13	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.60
14	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	3	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.57
17	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.18
19	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	2	3	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.56
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	10	10	0	3.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.84
23	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.12
24	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.67
26	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
28	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.71
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.60
32	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.13
33	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.88
35	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.06
36	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.42
37	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.09
Total		74	6	72	78	9	1.05	29	0.39	.	.	.	.	.	184.0	6.56