Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 2 hours and 30 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 03:29:56 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Robert Kelso Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	14	14	18	15	7

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
133 176th	.267 236th	13 187th	77 121st	55 95th

Career Honors

S152nd All-BIG-8

S161st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	28	.321	10	3	6	0.60	20	.700	1	0.20	3	.333	16.5	4.62
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.70
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	9	26	-.038	6	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.40
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	17	-.118	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.57
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	24	.208	3	1	5	0.20	12	.583	.	.	.	.	12.5	2.72
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	10	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.57
9	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	17	-.118	6	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.81
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	21	.476	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.5	7.64
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	2	0.67	2	1.000	7.0	3.23
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	21	.238	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.19
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	20	.300	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.78
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	12	.250	3	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.93
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.22
31	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	7	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.61
36	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	19	.579	9	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	2	0.40	4	.500	13.5	4.99
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	23	.609	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	1	0.25	2	.500	18.0	7.12
46	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	12	.000	7	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.48
Total		61	133	2.18	57	285	.267	95	13	36	0.21	213	.831	7	0.11	12	.583	176.5	4.86

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	12	1.90	30	5	.833	16.5	4.62
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	9	1.91	23	4	.826	7.5	4.70
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	10	1.88	25	3	.880	9.5	5.40
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	14	2.13	24	3	.875	5.0	3.57
6	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	15	1.80	41	7	.829	12.5	2.72
8	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	5	1.57	14	4	.714	5.0	3.57
9	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	1.74	19	4	.789	5.0	2.81
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	7	2.06	17	1	.941	13.5	7.64
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	10	1.96	27	3	.889	7.0	3.23
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	4	1.00	15	2.09	32	3	.906	16.0	6.19
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	7	1.75	8	1.74	27	3	.889	11.0	4.78
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	4	1.93	14	1	.929	8.5	4.93
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	9	2.35	17	0	1.000	10.0	6.22
31	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	7	2.33	7	2.23	13	1	.923	9.5	5.61
36	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	15	1.92	36	6	.833	13.5	4.99
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	15	2.19	32	1	.969	18.0	7.12
46	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	5	1.25	12	2.07	28	2	.929	8.5	4.48
Total		61	6	49	55	4	0.90	77	1.26	173	1.96	419	51	.878	176.5	4.86