Players

Pascal Ferland Senior Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	13	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	19	.368	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.19
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	17	.235	6	2	1	0.40	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.83
4	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	4	1	4	0.25	12	.667	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.35
5	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	16	.063	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.96
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	11	.545	7	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.63
8	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	12	.167	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.78
10	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.67
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	9	-.111	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.87
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	13	.077	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	12	.667	6	3	1	0.75	16	.938	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.35
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	10	.500	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.43
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	7	16	.125	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.82
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	17	.471	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.12
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	17	.647	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.73
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	20	.700	3	0	6	0.00	13	.538	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.32
26	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.02
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.03
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.46
39	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	21	.286	7	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.68
44	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	9	.556	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.87
Total		82	175	2.13	64	289	.384	87	15	38	0.18	256	.852	.	.	.	.	223.5	6.10

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.19
3	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.83
4	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.35
5	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.96
7	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.63
8	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.78
10	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.67
11	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.87
13	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.35
17	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.43
19	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	2	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.82
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.12
23	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.73
25	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.32
26	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.02
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
33	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.03
34	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.46
39	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.68
44	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.87
Total		82	6	55	61	12	0.74	18	0.22	.	.	.	.	.	223.5	6.10