Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	36	12.00	59	.610	2.5	7.40
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	0	4	0.00	17	.765	52	13.00	77	.675	1.5	8.73
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	10	1	1	0.33	16	.938	35	11.67	57	.614	3.5	8.80
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	40	13.33	56	.714	2.5	9.36
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	11	3	1	1.00	17	.941	33	11.00	53	.623	7.0	7.59
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	7	2	2	0.50	19	.895	54	13.50	88	.614	2.5	8.63
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	2	0	1	0.00	13	.923	41	10.25	87	.471	4.0	6.16
17	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	4	.250	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	45	11.25	97	.464	5.5	7.20
18	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	6	.000	7	3	2	0.75	17	.882	39	9.75	83	.470	5.5	5.15
21	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	9	.333	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	52	13.00	92	.565	4.5	8.52
22	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	7	.286	2	0	2	0.00	16	.875	53	10.60	107	.495	4.5	6.28
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	1	2	0.33	14	.857	34	11.33	62	.548	2.0	5.84
26	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	6	1	4	0.20	21	.810	53	10.60	85	.624	2.5	5.20
29	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	2	-1.000	8	2	2	0.67	15	.867	37	12.33	56	.661	3.0	8.61
36	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	34	11.33	63	.540	2.5	6.70
39	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	6	2	2	0.40	20	.900	57	11.40	87	.655	3.5	5.72
41	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	11	2	0	0.67	19	1.000	36	12.00	71	.507	5.0	9.02
46	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	10	.400	5	1	1	0.20	19	.947	58	11.60	108	.537	7.5	7.34
Total		68	27	0.40	11	78	.205	113	21	34	0.31	297	.886	789	11.60	1388	.568	69.5	7.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.40
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.73
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.80
9	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.36
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.59
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.63
15	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.16
17	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.20
18	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.15
21	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.52
22	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.28
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.84
26	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.20
29	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.61
36	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.70
39	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.72
41	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.02
46	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	2	1	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.34
Total		68	2	39	41	3	0.60	79	1.16	.	.	.	.	.	69.5	7.35