Players

Rik van den Bergh Senior Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	12	14	16

Career Honors

S172nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	6	.167	4	0	3	0.00	18	.833	52	10.40	97	.536	2.0	5.60
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	10	1	2	0.25	21	.905	45	11.25	78	.577	4.5	7.81
7	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	20	6.67	60	.333	1.0	2.06
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	46	11.50	79	.582	2.5	6.30
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	8	2	1	0.67	16	.938	39	13.00	57	.684	3.5	9.08
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	38	12.67	53	.717	3.5	9.78
16	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	7	2	2	0.67	16	.875	44	14.67	55	.800	4.0	9.39
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	44	14.67	67	.657	3.5	9.16
20	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	7	0	2	0.00	19	.895	62	15.50	83	.747	2.5	9.03
23	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	35	11.67	61	.574	6.0	7.49
24	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	7	.714	6	1	1	0.25	18	.944	55	13.75	90	.611	6.5	8.88
27	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	7	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	33	11.00	56	.589	3.0	5.68
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	4	1	2	0.25	16	.875	49	12.25	80	.613	2.5	6.66
32	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	7	3	2	1.00	16	.875	34	11.33	52	.654	5.0	7.63
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	5	2	1	0.50	16	.938	53	13.25	86	.616	8.0	9.50
37	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	6	1	2	0.33	15	.867	47	15.67	60	.783	3.5	9.36
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	34	11.33	59	.576	2.0	6.91
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	7	3	2	0.75	19	.895	52	13.00	84	.619	6.0	8.89
Total		63	34	0.54	5	72	.403	103	21	28	0.33	286	.902	782	12.41	1257	.622	69.5	7.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.60
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.81
7	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
11	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.30
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.08
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.78
16	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.39
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.16
20	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.03
23	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.49
24	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.88
27	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.68
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.66
32	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.63
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	9.50
37	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.36
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.91
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.89
Total		63	0	29	29	2	0.46	73	1.16	.	.	.	.	.	69.5	7.73