Players

Mikah Costa 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	11	11	14	11	4

Career Honors

S22nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	18	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.69
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.69
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.53
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	22	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.30
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	13	-.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.56
9	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	35	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.88
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.27
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	17	.118	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.41
19	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	7	22	.136	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.35
20	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.29
21	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	21	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.40
24	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	18	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.85
25	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	0	18	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.16
27	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	24	.083	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.20
29	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.59
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.62
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	15	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.12
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.21
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	26	.192	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.62
Total		69	159	2.30	63	352	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	189.0	4.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	21	2	.905	8.5	4.69
4	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	8	1.60	NA	NA	39	2	.949	14.0	5.69
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	NA	NA	29	3	.897	9.0	3.53
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	17.0	9.30
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	19	5	.737	4.5	2.56
9	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	15.5	8.88
14	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	NA	NA	18	3	.833	6.5	3.27
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	NA	NA	32	3	.906	6.0	3.41
19	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	NA	NA	25	1	.960	12.0	8.35
20	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	14	1	.929	14.0	5.29
21	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	NA	NA	34	3	.912	12.0	4.40
24	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	27	4	.852	6.5	2.85
25	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	NA	NA	30	7	.767	10.5	3.16
27	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	NA	NA	32	3	.906	9.5	4.20
29	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	22	2	.909	4.5	3.59
30	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	NA	NA	15	3	.800	7.5	3.62
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	NA	NA	30	6	.800	11.5	4.12
33	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	10	2.50	NA	NA	30	3	.900	9.5	5.21
34	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	26	2	.923	10.5	6.62
Total		69	1	32	33	6	0.48	120	1.74	0	0.00	473	53	.888	189.0	4.88