Players

Mikah Costa 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	11	11	14	11	4

Career Honors

S22nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.72
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	37	.351	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	25.5	9.01
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	20	.450	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.91
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.85
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	12	39	.051	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.45
9	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	6	40	.350	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.63
11	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	3	32	.531	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.76
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.04
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.00
17	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	19	.263	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.24
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	20	.150	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.46
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	19	.105	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.97
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.02
24	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	33	.242	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.68
26	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	25	.480	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.67
28	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	17	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	2.93
29	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	17	.529	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.75
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	23	.478	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.19
34	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.07
36	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	15	.467	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.02
38	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	18	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.73
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.60
43	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	23	.261	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.09
Total		83	245	2.95	90	490	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	305.0	5.90

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	12	4.00	NA	NA	14	0	1.000	9.5	6.72
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	NA	NA	29	1	.966	25.5	9.01
5	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	12	3	.750	17.0	6.91
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	NA	NA	10	0	1.000	12.0	6.85
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	28	3	.893	15.5	7.45
9	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	21.0	8.63
11	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	6	1.50	NA	NA	34	3	.912	25.5	8.76
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	13	2	.846	14.0	7.04
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	NA	NA	15	2	.867	7.5	4.00
17	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	NA	NA	37	4	.892	11.0	4.24
19	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	19	1	.947	9.0	5.46
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	15	1	.933	11.5	4.97
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	10.0	5.02
24	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	NA	NA	33	1	.970	18.0	7.68
26	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	NA	NA	16	4	.750	18.0	7.67
28	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	NA	NA	33	7	.788	9.5	2.93
29	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	13.0	7.75
32	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	NA	NA	24	2	.917	14.5	6.19
34	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	NA	NA	21	5	.762	6.0	2.07
36	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	23	4	.826	8.5	3.02
38	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	NA	NA	29	3	.897	10.5	5.73
41	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	NA	NA	23	1	.957	7.0	4.60
43	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	NA	NA	33	5	.848	11.0	3.09
Total		83	8	38	46	2	0.55	146	1.76	0	0.00	510	52	.898	305.0	5.90