Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	1	0.25	5	.200	1.0	5.50
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	7	1.75	14	.500	0.0	8.17
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	0	0.00	8	.000	2.0	8.24
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	.900	0.0	6.71
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	7.36
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	6.04
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	1.000	0.0	6.03
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	6.25
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.95
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	4.58
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	20	4	8	0.12	49	.837	46	1.35	86	.535	4.0	6.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	1.93	28	4	.857	1.0	5.50
6	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	14	2.06	32	2	.938	0.0	8.17
9	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.31	16	1	.938	2.0	8.24
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	3	1.57	14	1	.929	0.0	6.71
15	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.08	13	0	1.000	1.0	7.36
17	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.64	14	1	.929	0.0	6.04
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	2.10	10	1	.900	0.0	6.03
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	18	2.31	29	3	.897	0.0	6.25
30	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.00	21	1	.952	0.0	4.95
40	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	1.88	16	1	.938	0.0	4.58
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	86	2.53	89	2.09	193	15	.922	4.0	6.38