Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	3	.333	0.0	2.45
2	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	5.53
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	5.45
5	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.66
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.05
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	8.94
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	4.81
13	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	5.50
14	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	5.80
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.30
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.15
23	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	1.000	0.0	3.31
27	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	.800	0.0	3.60
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	4.18
32	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	11	.636	0.0	3.70
34	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	3.25
39	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.70
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	6.83
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	4	.750	0.0	4.85
45	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	2.05
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	63	0.90	95	.663	0.0	4.66

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	5	1.47	17	5	.706	0.0	2.45
2	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.12	17	1	.941	0.0	5.53
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	19	2.29	34	2	.941	0.0	5.45
5	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.05	19	1	.947	0.0	6.66
7	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.04	24	3	.875	0.0	3.05
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.50	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.94
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.39	23	1	.957	0.0	4.81
13	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.38	16	1	.938	0.0	5.50
14	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	17	2.18	33	2	.939	0.0	5.80
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.00	18	2	.889	0.0	5.30
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	20	2.18	38	4	.895	0.0	4.15
23	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.04	23	3	.870	0.0	3.31
27	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	18	2.26	31	3	.903	0.0	3.60
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.28	18	1	.944	0.0	4.18
32	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	18	2.22	32	2	.938	0.0	3.70
34	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	18	2.28	32	2	.938	0.0	3.25
39	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.22	23	2	.913	0.0	3.70
40	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	16	2.50	24	1	.958	0.0	6.83
44	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	17	2.09	34	5	.853	0.0	4.85
45	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	1.70	27	6	.778	0.0	2.05
Total		70	.	.	.	.	.	88	1.26	261	2.17	501	47	.906	0.0	4.66