Players

Jurgen Strobel Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	11	16	10	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.88
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	25	.720	6	1	4	0.25	15	.733	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.25
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	21	.190	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.12
6	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	25	6.25	4	37	.568	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	25.5	6.74
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.77
9	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	31	.419	9	0	1	0.00	21	.952	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.93
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.70
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	17	.765	1	1	4	0.33	10	.600	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.5	8.27
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	24	.542	4	0	1	0.00	17	.941	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	4.23
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	0	0	3	0.00	5	.400	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.27
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	21	.476	10	0	4	0.00	18	.778	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.00
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	8	0	2	0.00	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.60
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.38
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	23	.391	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.19
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.38
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	16	.563	4	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.85
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	12	.500	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.13
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	27	.444	2	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.35
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	30	.533	5	1	1	0.20	18	.944	1	0.20	3	.333	23.5	7.75
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	29	.586	13	1	3	0.20	27	.889	1	0.20	1	1.000	20.0	7.94
Total		74	263	3.55	56	398	.520	89	7	43	0.09	269	.840	3	0.04	7	.429	294.5	6.89

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	9	3.00	3	2.00	7	0	1.000	6.5	4.88
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	13	1.97	30	3	.900	21.5	7.25
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	8	1.79	19	3	.842	11.5	6.12
6	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	6	1.87	15	2	.867	25.5	6.74
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	10	2.11	18	0	1.000	10.5	6.77
9	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	15	2.27	26	2	.923	19.5	8.93
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	1.88	24	4	.833	9.5	4.70
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	16	2.28	29	1	.966	16.5	8.27
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	3	1.71	21	1	.952	16.0	4.23
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	11.0	7.27
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	2	1	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	13	2.30	23	0	1.000	15.5	8.00
25	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	11	2.75	13	2.47	19	1	.947	8.5	5.60
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	4	2.20	10	0	1.000	13.0	7.38
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	10	2.50	16	2.17	30	1	.967	14.5	7.19
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	9	2.33	15	1	.933	10.0	7.38
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	6	2.27	11	0	1.000	12.5	7.85
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	8	2.60	10	0	1.000	10.0	7.13
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	25	2.27	45	4	.911	19.0	6.35
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	10	2.33	21	0	1.000	23.5	7.75
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	13	2.32	22	0	1.000	20.0	7.94
Total		74	3	43	46	5	0.62	119	1.61	205	2.17	403	23	.943	294.5	6.89