Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.50
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	6	.667	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	1.60
17	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.38
18	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	3	0.50	19	.842	5	1.25	13	.385	2.0	7.49
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	7	.429	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	6.40
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	1.93
26	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	4.40
35	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	7	.571	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	2.58
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.85
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.60
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	21	2	16	0.06	61	.738	29	0.94	53	.547	2.0	4.07

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.96	26	3	.885	0.0	3.50
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	1.52	23	5	.783	0.0	1.60
17	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.56	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.38
18	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	11	1.96	26	3	.885	2.0	7.49
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.30	23	1	.957	0.0	6.40
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.61	31	7	.774	0.0	1.93
26	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.89	18	5	.722	0.0	4.40
35	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.71	31	8	.742	0.0	2.58
40	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.69	26	6	.769	0.0	3.85
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.63	27	3	.889	0.0	3.60
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	43	1.39	96	1.85	247	41	.834	2.0	4.07