Players

Phillip Kelly Senior Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	13	12	13	15

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	8	2	2	0.67	18	.889	37	12.33	76	.487	4.0	7.78
2	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	3	1	4	0.20	16	.750	61	12.20	94	.649	2.0	6.70
4	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	8	.125	3	0	4	0.00	14	.714	45	11.25	88	.511	4.5	6.97
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	6	1	5	0.25	18	.722	51	12.75	87	.586	5.5	8.69
8	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	7	1	1	0.25	19	.947	55	13.75	83	.663	4.0	9.01
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	4	1	3	0.33	13	.769	27	9.00	60	.450	3.5	5.02
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	1	1.000	6	0	1	0.00	17	.941	53	13.25	82	.646	2.0	8.70
12	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	2	1	0.67	16	.938	42	14.00	65	.646	2.5	8.54
13	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	38	12.67	61	.623	1.5	7.26
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	49	12.25	82	.598	5.0	8.10
17	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	26	8.67	67	.388	2.5	4.39
18	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	31	10.33	49	.633	2.0	7.00
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	24	8.00	61	.393	0.0	2.52
26	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	3	1	2	0.20	16	.875	55	11.00	107	.514	2.5	5.06
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	4	1.000	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	42	10.50	79	.532	4.5	5.58
Total		55	17	0.31	5	52	.231	66	11	32	0.20	221	.855	636	11.56	1141	.557	46.0	6.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.78
2	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.70
4	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	1	1.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.97
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	2	1.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.69
8	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.01
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.02
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.70
12	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.54
13	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.26
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.10
17	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.39
18	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.00
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.52
26	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.06
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.58
Total		55	5	26	31	4	0.56	62	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	46.0	6.75