Players

Carlos Matthews Senior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	15	-	-	14	10

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.40	14	.929	9	1.80	14	.643	2.0	7.59
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	5.70
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	7	2.33	10	.700	0.0	7.54
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.50	14	.857	4	1.00	6	.667	2.0	5.80
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	7	.714	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	10.00
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	5.81
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	9	2.25	14	.643	0.0	8.04
16	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.50
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	8.01
20	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	4	1.00	7	.571	2.0	5.65
23	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	7.06
24	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	5.40
27	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	3.38
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	1	0.25	5	.200	1.0	5.03
32	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	6.76
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	12	.917	5	1.25	8	.625	1.0	5.25
37	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	7.61
39	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	3	0.60	7	.429	0.0	5.68
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	3	0.67	12	.750	7	2.33	9	.778	2.0	6.66
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.50	15	.867	5	1.25	6	.833	2.0	7.86
46	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	1	0.20	20	.950	5	1.00	11	.455	1.0	8.39
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	77	14	37	0.18	221	.833	94	1.22	158	.595	14.0	6.61

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	13	2.42	26	0	1.000	2.0	7.59
3	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	12	2.00	29	4	.862	0.0	5.70
5	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	0.0	7.54
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	2.11	18	2	.889	2.0	5.80
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.67	12	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
12	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.14	14	0	1.000	0.0	5.81
14	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.64	14	0	1.000	0.0	8.04
16	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.25	12	2	.833	0.0	5.50
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.01
20	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	2.37	19	1	.947	2.0	5.65
23	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.20	15	0	1.000	1.0	7.06
24	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.19	27	3	.889	0.0	5.40
27	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	1.91	11	2	.818	0.0	3.38
31	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	11	2.44	18	1	.944	1.0	5.03
32	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.75	8	0	1.000	0.0	6.76
34	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	6	2.14	14	0	1.000	1.0	5.25
37	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	2.45	11	0	1.000	0.0	7.61
39	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	16	2.56	25	0	1.000	0.0	5.68
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.55	11	0	1.000	2.0	6.66
44	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	2.0	7.86
46	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	11	2.57	14	1	.929	1.0	8.39
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	134	1.74	197	2.35	344	16	.953	14.0	6.61